Alfred Mele spins the neural roulette wheel behind our choices.

It’s what Pam R Sailors thinks about, when she thinks about running.

Kevin DeLapp and Jeremy Henkel on Augustine, Kant and FBI Director James Comey.

Constantine Sandis and Nassim N Taleb on how to think about risk, harm and having skin in the game.

Nicholas G. Evans thinks through the tangle of rights and wrongs

Peter Worley argues that philosophy in the classroom depends on a skilled facilitator.

Julian Baggini reviews Kathleen Stock's controversial new book.

G. Fay Edwards examines some bizarre ancient arguments against eating our fellow creatures

By Anil Gomes

Rupert Read introduces the work and ideas of Ludwig Wittgenstein.

Julian Baggini looks beyond traditional approaches to the free will debate.

In 2001, Julian Baggini interviewed Hilary Putnam (1926-2016), the philosopher who never stood still

Alexandra Bradner and Andrew P. Mills argue that teaching is a lot more than just telling

Eric Schwitzgebel, Liam Kofi Bright, Carolyn Dicey Jennings, Morgan Thompson and Eric Winsberg explore recent data.

Berit Brogaard asks, does the idea of irrational love make sense?

Margaret Betz reviews Camus' classic.

Helen de Cruz talks to Philosophy PhDs outside the academy who most definitely are not “slumming it”.

Quassim Cassam looks at the conduct of our politicians through the lens of vice epistemology, and asks how useful an understanding of epistemic vices is as a tool of political analysis?

Stephen Mumford argues that sport's importance lies in the connections between embodiment, power and freedom.

Stella Sandford on why calls to diversify the curriculum sparked outrage in the papers

Quassim Cassam makes a case for a new, human picture of self-knowledge.