It’s what Pam R Sailors thinks about, when she thinks about running.
Alfred Mele spins the neural roulette wheel behind our choices.
Kevin DeLapp and Jeremy Henkel on Augustine, Kant and FBI Director James Comey.
Eric Schwitzgebel, Liam Kofi Bright, Carolyn Dicey Jennings, Morgan Thompson and Eric Winsberg explore recent data.
Julian Baggini reviews Kathleen Stock's controversial new book.
Nicholas G. Evans thinks through the tangle of rights and wrongs
Constantine Sandis and Nassim N Taleb on how to think about risk, harm and having skin in the game.
Peter Worley argues that philosophy in the classroom depends on a skilled facilitator.
Jane Clare Jones argues, contra MacKinnon, that decoupling sex and gender deprives feminist analysis of its explanatory power.
G. Fay Edwards examines some bizarre ancient arguments against eating our fellow creatures
By Anil Gomes
Rupert Read introduces the work and ideas of Ludwig Wittgenstein.
Julian Baggini looks beyond traditional approaches to the free will debate.
Berit Brogaard asks, does the idea of irrational love make sense?
Alexandra Bradner and Andrew P. Mills argue that teaching is a lot more than just telling
In 2001, Julian Baggini interviewed Hilary Putnam (1926-2016), the philosopher who never stood still
Margaret Betz reviews Camus' classic.
Helen Beebee looks back on the last ten years.
Helen de Cruz talks to Philosophy PhDs outside the academy who most definitely are not “slumming it”.
Stephen Mumford argues that sport's importance lies in the connections between embodiment, power and freedom.
Quassim Cassam looks at the conduct of our politicians through the lens of vice epistemology, and asks how useful an understanding of epistemic vices is as a tool of political analysis?
It’s what Pam R Sailors thinks about, when she thinks about running.
Alfred Mele spins the neural roulette wheel behind our choices.
Kevin DeLapp and Jeremy Henkel on Augustine, Kant and FBI Director James Comey.
Eric Schwitzgebel, Liam Kofi Bright, Carolyn Dicey Jennings, Morgan Thompson and Eric Winsberg explore recent data.
Julian Baggini reviews Kathleen Stock's controversial new book.
Nicholas G. Evans thinks through the tangle of rights and wrongs
Constantine Sandis and Nassim N Taleb on how to think about risk, harm and having skin in the game.
Peter Worley argues that philosophy in the classroom depends on a skilled facilitator.
Jane Clare Jones argues, contra MacKinnon, that decoupling sex and gender deprives feminist analysis of its explanatory power.
G. Fay Edwards examines some bizarre ancient arguments against eating our fellow creatures
By Anil Gomes
Rupert Read introduces the work and ideas of Ludwig Wittgenstein.
Julian Baggini looks beyond traditional approaches to the free will debate.
Berit Brogaard asks, does the idea of irrational love make sense?
Alexandra Bradner and Andrew P. Mills argue that teaching is a lot more than just telling
In 2001, Julian Baggini interviewed Hilary Putnam (1926-2016), the philosopher who never stood still
Margaret Betz reviews Camus' classic.
Helen Beebee looks back on the last ten years.
Helen de Cruz talks to Philosophy PhDs outside the academy who most definitely are not “slumming it”.
Stephen Mumford argues that sport's importance lies in the connections between embodiment, power and freedom.
Quassim Cassam looks at the conduct of our politicians through the lens of vice epistemology, and asks how useful an understanding of epistemic vices is as a tool of political analysis?
The Philosophers’ Magazine is an independent quarterly, founded by Julian Baggini and Jeremy Stangroom in 1997. We’re devoted to publishing philosophy that’s clear, enlightening, and thought-provoking.
Copyright © 2017 The Philosophers' Magazine Unless specified, images courtesy of FORTEPAN